<< November 2004 | January 2005 >>
- Court nixes lawsuit fighting copyright law [CNET News.com]
- Promise and pitfalls of e-printing [Australian IT]
- Gay book ban goal of state lawmaker [The Birmingham News]
- Library cats curl up with some good books [Chicago Tribune]
- An Idea Whose Time Has Come Back [The New York Times]
- Remembrance of Catalog Cards Past [Nebraska Library Quarterly]
- Barks of approval for literacy [The Denver Post]
- Libraries and university presses can collaborate to improve scholarly communication [First Monday]
- Libraries Reach Out, Online [The New York Times]
- Students shun search for information offline [CNN]
- High Court To Weigh File Sharing [The Washington Post]
- Libraries turn to collection agencies for overdue books [Ohio News Now]
- Flash memory coaxes audiobooks out of the '70s [CNET News.com]
- Law librarians say technology has them more in demand [Memphis Business Journal]
- Does Google move augur commercialization of libraries? [Detriot Free Press]
- How to release books into the wild [The Christian Science Monitor]
- The Role of RSS in Science Publishing [D-Lib Magazine]
- More schools offer cheap music downloads for students [USA Today]
- Library workers angry over closings [The Herald]
- Is There Censorship? [The New York Times]
- Keeping Track of the Scores [The Los Angeles Times]
- Newest Rulings on Alternative Source Citing [PostModern Language Association]
- Oprah's OK sends book sales soaring [Chicago Sun-Times]
- Googlizers vs. Resistors [Library Journal]
- Why Being a Librarian is a Radical Choice [Dissident Voice]
- Southfield restricts Oak Park readers [Detriot Free Press]
- Good to the Last Drop: Dimensions and Cultural Implications of Coffee Service in Libraries [Asheim Group]
- Harry Potter book tops sales list before printing [The Des Moines Register]
- Comics prove reading can be laughing matter [Grand Forks Herlad]
- Internet Archive to build alternative to Google [Information World Review]
- A Video Game Revolution [KIMT]
These links are not updated for accuracy; older links may be dead.